Commentator Marshall77 has resurfaced a contentious and ongoing crisis in labyrinth theory.
What is the essential identity of the labyrinth? How is this identity ontologically distinct from the maze?
We need a new lexicon through which to penetrate the labyrinth's identity crisis, and I post these questions in hopes for a continuing discussion about this most urgent topic in contemporary labyrinth theory.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
6 comments:
Can't this just be reduced to an argument of semantics? Also, are you guys going to do a billboard like Whodey Revolution?
Are we talking Davie Bowie style labyrinth or Guillermo del Toro Pan's Labyrinth labyrinth. That could make a difference.
Let's try to keep our discourse at least quasi-academic, Julie.
Pan's Labyrinth was a dumb movie.
I am so tired of people simply making claims without any substance. Why was it dumb? Because you didn't feel like reading subtitles, probably.
I think mazes have dead-ends and labyrinths don't.
Whodey Revolution has been routed and squashed.
Go Browns.
Post a Comment